Privacy Law & The Internet
Presented by Julianna Yau
- lag in privacy legislation versus emerging technologies
- minority government impact
- problems with integrating specific technologies with legislation
- do we feel the law protects our privacy, even without taking the internet into account?
- do companies abide by PIPEDA now? examples that they don’t
- companies use legalese to trick people into giving consent for things they don’t want to give
- law doesn’t protect – it is reactive
- companies are “oopsing” all over the place — where’s the accountability?
- is there any accountability within companies to be proactive about privacy?
- issues of ownership of data — is it yours because it is information about you, or does the entity that took your data own it because they are storing it and/or have been provided the data
- companies need to understand privacy and think about why they need to collect information
- some people don’t like all the security layers
- people want choice of information being provided for security
- someone was able to create a fake identity (there is a Wired article about this)
- issues of privacy and globalization – our laws only apply within Canada
- Rogers One Bill – problems with implementation
- paying for privacy – not technically legal, but phone companies charge for private listings






Law needs to focus on principles. It can’t try to keep up with every technology change – it will always fail, and might even restrict the development of new approaches.
You’re absolutely right, John. The challenge seems to be that many changes in legislation these days are unable to separate themselves with technology.